• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
MacElree Harvey, Ltd.

MacElree Harvey, Ltd.

Initiative in Practice

  • Home
  • Legal Services
        • Banking & Finance Law
        • Business & Corporate Law
        • Criminal Defense
        • Employment Law
        • Estates & Trusts Law
        • Family Law
        • Litigation Law
        • Mediation and Arbitration
        • Personal Injury Law
        • Real Estate & Land Use Law
        • Tax Law
  • Our Team
        • Joseph A. Bellinghieri
        • Hiruy Y. Berhane
        • Patrick J. Boyer
        • Krzysztof M. Bozentka
        • Jeffrey P. Burke
        • Robert A. Burke
        • Matthew C. Cooper
        • Marie I. Crossley
        • Pilar Diaz
        • Harry J. DiDonato
        • Jaycie DiNardo
        • Caroline G. Donato
        • Nicholas S. Eisel
        • Sally A. Farrell
        • Brian J. Forgue
        • William J. Gallagher
        • Patrick J. Gallo, Jr.
        • Mary Kay Gaver
        • J. Charles Gerbron, Jr.
        • Leo M. Gibbons
        • Joseph P. Green, Jr.
        • Frank W. Hosking III
        • Katherine A. Isard
        • Peter E. Kratsa
        • Mary E. Lawrence
        • Daniel R. Losco
        • Michael G. Louis
        • John F. McKenna
        • Matthew M. McKeon
        • Lou Mincarelli
        • Brian L. Nagle
        • Lance J. Nelson
        • Timothy F. Rayne
        • Michael C. Rovito
        • Duke Schneider
        • Andrew R. Silverman
        • Ashley B. Stitzer
        • Patrick L. Ware
        • Jeremy A. Whalen
        • Natalie R. Young
  • About Us
    • Our History
    • Our Approach
    • Social Responsibility
    • Testimonials
  • Careers
  • News & Updates
    • Articles by Our Attorneys
    • News
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Newsletters
  • Offices
    • Centreville, DE
    • Kennett Square, PA
    • West Chester, PA
  • Contact
  • (610) 436-0100

Employment Law Update October 2026

October 30, 2026 by Jeffrey P. Burke, Esq. Leave a Comment

Our October Employment Law Update explores the evolving legal landscape surrounding pregnancy in the workplace, highlighting what employers and employees need to know to balance workplace obligations with the needs of growing families. Read on for the key laws and practical takeaways.

Navigating Pregnancy in the Workplace: Balancing Family Needs and Business Realities

Pregnancy is a deeply personal milestone that affects more than the employee experiencing it. For families, it brings excitement, new responsibilities, and important decisions about health, work, and time at home. For employers, it can present real challenges involving staffing, scheduling, workplace safety, and leave planning. Employment laws seek to balance these interests, protecting employees from discrimination while helping employers understand their obligations. Knowing which rules apply – and addressing concerns early – can make the process smoother for everyone.

Title VII and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA). Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the PDA, prohibits discrimination based on pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions. Employers generally must treat pregnant employees the same as other employees similar in their ability or inability to work. These protections extend to hiring, benefits, leave, discipline, and termination. Employers should avoid assumptions about an employee’s capabilities or commitment based on pregnancy or anticipated caregiving responsibilities.

Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA). Effective June 27, 2023, the PWFA requires covered employers with 15 or more employees to reasonably accommodate known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, absent undue hardship. Implementing regulations took effect in June 2024.

Accommodations may include additional restroom breaks, permission to sit, lifting restrictions, schedule adjustments, time off for appointments, or leave for recovery. Employers generally cannot require an employee to take leave when another reasonable accommodation would allow the employee to keep working. Employees should communicate their needs, and employers should engage in a timely, individualized discussion to identify workable solutions. Employers may consider alternatives and deny accommodations that would impose undue hardship.

Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (PHRA). Pennsylvania employers must also consider the PHRA, which prohibits sex discrimination, including pregnancy discrimination. Unlike Title VII, which generally covers employers with 15 or more employees, the PHRA generally applies to employers with four or more employees. This lower threshold makes the law especially important for small businesses.

Pennsylvania regulations also address pregnancy-related disabilities, requiring employers to treat them consistently with other temporary disabilities under applicable employment policies. Leave, benefits, and job-security practices should be reviewed to ensure pregnant employees are not treated less favorably than employees with comparable limitations.

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Pregnancy itself is not a disability under the ADA, but related conditions—such as gestational diabetes or preeclampsia – may qualify. When the ADA applies, employers must consider reasonable accommodations for qualified employees with disabilities, subject to applicable requirements and undue hardship.

Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Eligible employees of covered employers may take up to 12 workweeks of unpaid, job-protected leave for qualifying reasons, including prenatal care, pregnancy-related incapacity, childbirth recovery, and bonding with a new child. Eligibility requirements apply, and FMLA leave may overlap with other protected leave.

Pumping and other protections. The PUMP Act generally requires reasonable break time and a private, non-bathroom space for employees to express breast milk for one year after childbirth. State and local laws may provide additional protections.

Practical takeaways. Employees should communicate accommodation and leave needs early and follow applicable notice procedures. Employers should train supervisors, protect medical confidentiality, document accommodation discussions, and apply workplace policies consistently. Above all, pregnancy-related requests and complaints should never prompt retaliation.

Pregnancy in the workplace need not become an adversarial process. With clear communication, thoughtful planning, and an understanding of the applicable laws, employers can address legitimate business needs while helping employees navigate an important moment in their family lives.

Jeff Burke is an attorney at MacElree Harvey, Ltd., working in the firm’s Employment and Litigation practice groups. Jeff counsels businesses and individuals on employment practices and policies, executive compensation, employee hiring and separation issues, non-competition and other restrictive covenants, wage and hour disputes, and other employment-related matters. Jeff represents businesses and individuals in employment litigation such as employment contract disputes, workforce classification audits, and discrimination claims based upon age, sex, race, religion, disability, sexual harassment, and hostile work environment. Jeff also practices in commercial litigation as well as counsels businesses on commercial contract matters.  

Filed Under: Articles by Our Attorneys Tagged With: Jeffrey Burke

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Footer

(610) 436-0100

LEGAL SERVICES

ABOUT US

NEWS & INSIGHTS

OFFICES

Centreville, DE

5721 Kennett Pike
Wilmington, DE 19807
302-654-4454
Learn More

Kennett Square, PA

209 East State Street Road
Kennett Square, PA 19348
610-444-3180
Learn More

West Chester, PA

17 West Miner Street
West Chester, PA 19382
610-436-0100
Learn More

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Staff Only
  • Careers

© 2026 and all rights reserved by MacElree Harvey, Ltd.