• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
MacElree Harvey, Ltd.

MacElree Harvey, Ltd.

Initiative in Practice

  • Home
  • Legal Services
        • Banking & Finance Law
        • Business & Corporate Law
        • Criminal Defense
        • Employment Law
        • Estates & Trusts Law
        • Family Law
        • Litigation Law
        • Mediation and Arbitration
        • Personal Injury Law
        • Real Estate & Land Use Law
        • Tax Law
  • Our Team
        • Joseph A. Bellinghieri
        • Patrick J. Boyer
        • Jeffrey P. Burke
        • Robert A. Burke
        • Matthew C. Cooper
        • John C. Cronin
        • Daniel T. Crossland
        • Marie I. Crossley
        • Harry J. DiDonato
        • Jaycie DiNardo
        • Caroline G. Donato
        • Sally A. Farrell
        • Brian J. Forgue
        • William J. Gallagher
        • Patrick J. Gallo, Jr.
        • Mary Kay Gaver
        • J. Charles Gerbron, Jr.
        • Leo M. Gibbons
        • Joseph P. Green, Jr.
        • Carolina Heinle
        • Court Heinle
        • Frank W. Hosking III
        • Katherine A. Isard
        • J. Kurtis Kline
        • Peter E. Kratsa
        • Mary E. Lawrence
        • Daniel R. Losco
        • Michael G. Louis
        • Jamison C. MacMain
        • John F. McKenna
        • Matthew M. McKeon
        • Brian L. Nagle
        • Lance J. Nelson
        • Timothy F. Rayne
        • Michael C. Rovito
        • Duke Schneider
        • Andrew R. Silverman
        • Ashley B. Stitzer
        • Robert M. Tucker
        • Natalie R. Young
  • About Us
    • Our History
    • Our Approach
    • Social Responsibility
    • Testimonials
  • Careers
  • News & Updates
    • Articles by Our Attorneys
    • News
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Newsletters
  • Offices
    • Centreville, DE
    • Hockessin, DE
    • Kennett Square, PA
    • West Chester, PA
  • Contact
  • (610) 436-0100

News

MacElree Harvey Named 2024 Top Workplace by Philadelphia Inquirer

May 13, 2024 by MacElree Harvey, Ltd. 2 Comments

We are pleased to announce that MacElree Harvey was named as a Top Workplace by the Philadelphia Inquirer for 2024, for the second year in a row.

MacElree Harvey received this recognition in the small company category and is one of only 81 companies honored this year.

The nomination process is comprehensive. Each year, employees play an integral role in the selection process, completing a questionnaire that delves into various facets of workplace satisfaction. This survey, consisting of 24 insightful questions, probes into key areas such as Alignment, Connection, Effectiveness, My Manager, Engagement, Leadership, and The Basics. These categories encompass a spectrum of workplace dynamics, from company values and leadership confidence to employee appreciation and developmental support.

“Top Workplaces put the employee at the center of things, and focus on creating the right environment to unleash potential and inspire performance,” remarked Doug Claffey, CEO of Energage, the esteemed research partner for Top Workplaces. This sentiment resonates deeply with MacElree Harvey, where fostering a supportive and inclusive environment has always been a cornerstone of its organizational ethos.

What sets MacElree Harvey apart, as noted by both its employees and the Inquirer.com, is its emphasis on Connection and Alignment. Employees consistently rate these aspects as paramount, valuing a workplace where they feel appreciated, their work is meaningful, and they are aligned with the company’s values and direction. This focus on fostering genuine connections and ensuring alignment with organizational goals speaks volumes about the firm’s commitment to nurturing a thriving and cohesive work culture.

About MacElree Harvey

MacElree Harvey is a full-service law firm representing clients and businesses in Pennsylvania and Delaware. The firm has 45 attorneys who have long had a reputation for Initiative® — in listening, in counsel, in court, and in protecting the interests of every client. Learn more about the MacElree Harvey difference at macelree.com.

View the 2024 ranks: sponsored.inquirer.com/the-inquirers-top-workplaces-2024-ranked

Filed Under: News

BREAKING NEWS: FTC Bans Non-Compete Agreements Nationwide

April 29, 2024 by MacElree Harvey, Ltd. Leave a Comment

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a Final Rule this week to ban non-compete agreements, marking a significant shift in employment law nationwide.  The Final Rule is not an absolute ban, however the exceptions are narrow.  Some key takeaways from the Final Rule are:

  • The Ban does away with all new post-employment non-compete agreements between employers and employees, regardless of industry or type of worker.
  • The Ban allows existing post-employment non-compete agreements to remain in effect only for senior executives. A “senior executive” is defined as an employee “earning more than $151,164 annually who [is] in a policy-making position.”
  • The Final Rule calls for notice to employees that previously executed post-employment non-compete agreements are no longer enforceable.
  • The Ban creates an exception for the sale of a business, regardless of the ownership percentage.
  • The Ban does not apply to franchisee/franchisor contracts (though the Ban does apply to employees working for a franchisee or franchisor).

The FTC rule isn’t set to go into effect until 120 days from the day it is published in the Federal Register, so likely not before September, 2024.  Moreover, less than 24 hours after the FTC issued the final rule, the US Chamber of Commerce filed a lawsuit against the agency in federal court in the Eastern District of Texas.  As such, the final impact of the Rule is yet to be determined.

Ultimately, employers may need to reassess their employment practices and consider alternative ways to protect their interests without resorting to non-compete agreements.  Meanwhile, employees may find themselves with greater freedom in their career paths. As this issue continues to evolve, both employers and employees should stay informed about their rights and responsibilities under the new regulatory landscape.

Jeff Burke is an attorney at MacElree Harvey, Ltd., working in the firm’s Employment and Litigation practice groups. Jeff counsels businesses and individuals on employment practices and policies, executive compensation, employee hiring and separation issues, non-competition and other restrictive covenants, wage and hour disputes, and other employment-related matters. Jeff represents businesses and individuals in employment litigation such as employment contract disputes, workforce classification audits, and discrimination claims based upon age, sex, race, religion, disability, sexual harassment, and hostile work environment.  Jeff also practices in commercial litigation as well as counsels business on commercial contract matters.

Filed Under: News

MacElree Harvey Law Firm Grows Mediation and Arbitration Practice – MH MA

April 1, 2024 by MacElree Harvey, Ltd. Leave a Comment

[West Chester, PA April 3, 2024] – In response to the growing demand for efficient and cost-effective dispute resolution, MacElree Harvey is pleased to announce the continued growth of our Mediation and Arbitration practice area, MH MA. The group now consists of West Chester based John McKenna and Judge Lou Mincarelli, in conjunction with Delaware attorneys Marie Crossley and Daniel Crossland. “MH MA” specializes in providing clients with streamlined and collaborative solutions to legal conflicts.

Disputes are an inevitable part of business and personal relationships, and finding effective resolutions is crucial. MH MA recognizes the need for alternatives to traditional lawsuits and introduces mediation and arbitration services, offering distinct advantages in terms of cost-effectiveness and efficiency.

Mediation and arbitration provide a more expedient resolution compared to protracted courtroom litigation, allowing parties to control the pace of the dispute resolution process. MH MA’s team act as neutral facilitators, guiding conflicting parties toward mutually beneficial agreements.

Explore the possibilities with MacElree Harvey and discover a collaborative approach to dispute resolution. Contact our group of five seasoned professionals or reach out to MacElree Harvey to schedule a consultation and take the first step toward resolving disputes effectively and efficiently.

About MacElree Harvey

MacElree Harvey, Ltd. is a full-service law firm with offices in Pennsylvania and Delaware. Providing “Initiative in the Practice®” of law for more than 140 years, MacElree Harvey serves clients in over thirty areas of law and is committed to providing clients with the depth of expertise and the resources expected of large firms without sacrificing the responsiveness and personal attention typically found in much smaller firms. To learn more about MacElree Harvey, Ltd., visit www.macelree.com.

Contact Information:

MacElree Harvey, Ltd: email [email protected] or call (610) 436-0100

John McKenna: email [email protected] or call (610) 840-0215

Judge Lou Mincarelli: email [email protected] or call (610) 840-0276

Marie Crossley: email [email protected] or call (302) 763-3133

Daniel Crossland: email [email protected] or call (302) 763-3129

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Daniel Crossland, John McKenna, Lou Mincarelli, Marie I. Crossley, Mediation and Arbitration

MacElree Harvey Partner Tim Rayne Featured in the Legal Intelligencer

March 26, 2024 by MacElree Harvey, Ltd. Leave a Comment

MacElree Harvey Partner Tim Rayne is featured in The Legal Intelligencer.

“How One PI Lawyer Built a Huge Practice Without Advertising” by Stacy West Clark of Stacy Clark Marketing highlights Tim’s personal branding and marketing efforts over the last 20+ years.

Said Tim, “the key to marketing is being top of mind with as many people as possible so that when they hear of a legal need in my area, they think of me and refer me. Over 30 years, I’ve gotten to know a lot of people, but I truly believe that vast majority of my current cases are coming from my Internet presence and regular posting as opposed to referrals that I would have gotten just through traditional handshake marketing.”

Tim films TikTok/Instagram Reels and has over 385 videos to date.


“I love my job and I feel like I am doing a public service with my marketing by educating the public on important insurance choices, their legal rights and the insurance claim process. I always try to think about “what’s in it for the audience” and how I can educate and entertain them.”

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Timothy F. Rayne

Patrick J. Boyer, Esquire Presents at Delaware Family Law Update

February 16, 2024 by MacElree Harvey, Ltd. Leave a Comment

Patrick J. Boyer, Esquire presented on a panel at the Family Law Update CLE regarding the topic of narcissism. 

The Family Law Update is an annual CLE devoted to family law and is regularly attended by other family law practitioners in Delaware. The panel included mental health professionals, a Family Court Judge, and another family law practitioner, and focused on how to deal with narcissistic personalities in Family Court.

Patrick is partner in the firm’s Centreville office who practices exclusively in the area of family law where he has handled all types of Family Court matters, including high conflict divorce and custody cases. If you have a family law issue, including where you believe you are dealing with a narcissist, you can contact Patrick J. Boyer at 302-654-4454.

Filed Under: News

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Decides Important Car Insurance Case (Rush v. Erie) Which Invalidates Underinsured Coverage for Drivers of Company Cars and Other Regularly Used Vehicles

February 1, 2024 by Timothy F. Rayne, Esq. Leave a Comment

On January 29, 2024, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decided Rush v. Erie Insurance holding that a Regular Use Exclusion was valid and could be used to deny payment of Underinsurance Benefits under a personal Car Insurance Policy. This decision has widespread implications for drivers of Company Cars as well as workers who regularly drive vehicles that they do not own.

Facts of the Rush v. Erie Insurance Case

Matthew Rush was a detective for the City of Easton and was injured while driving an unmarked police car owned by the City. The police car was insured by Traveler’s and had just $35,000 of Underinsured Benefits.

Rush and his wife had two personal car insurance policies with Erie, one with stacked Underinsured Limits of $250,000 for one vehicle and the other with stacked Underinsured Limits of $250,000 for two vehicles.

Both Erie policies contained identical “Regular Use Exclusions” of Underinsured coverage, which provided that the underinsured coverage did not apply to “bodily injury to you or a resident using a non-owned motor vehicle, or a non-owned miscellaneous vehicle, which is regularly used by you or a resident, but not insured for uninsured or underinsured coverage under this policy.”

The driver responsible for causing the crash injuring Rush paid his policy limits as did Traveler’s for the City of Easton’s Underinsurance Benefits.

However, Erie denied the Rush Underinsurance claim for $750,000 citing the Regular Use Exclusion. Erie argued that Rush was driving a vehicle he did not own but regularly used, which invalidated Underinsured Coverage on the Erie policies.

The Court Decisions

After the Underinsurance Coverage was denied, Rush filed a lawsuit in Northhampton County against Erie claiming that the “Regular Use Exclusion” violated the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Responsibility Law which mandates that insurance companies provide Underinsurance coverage unless the policy holder signs a valid waiver form rejecting such coverage.

The Northampton Court ruled in favor of Rush as did the Pennsylvania Superior Court.

However, in a reversal of fortune for Rush and other Pennsylvania policy holders, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court reversed the ruling and held that the Regular Use Exclusion does not violate Pennsylvania law and is permissible. Consequently, Rush could not claim Underinsurance Benefits under the Erie Policies.

Practical Implications for Drivers of Regularly Used but Non-Owned Vehicles

The practical implication of this decision by the Supreme Court is that it puts drivers who regularly use vehicles that they do not own (like company cars or vehicles used during the workday like government vehicles, construction vehicles or delivery vehicles) in a pickle.

If the Regular Use Exclusion had been determined to be invalid, then these drivers could have protected themselves and their families by purchasing large amounts of Underinsured Coverage on their own car insurance policies. That way, if they were injured in an accident while driving the non-owned vehicle, even if the responsible driver had little or no insurance, they could protect their right to full compensation by purchasing large amounts of uninsured and underinsured coverage. This would allow them to make a claim on their own policy and be fully compensated. In essence they could protect themselves and their families with their own car insurance choices.

However, with the Supreme Court upholding the Regular Use Exclusion, the net result is that the driver or a non-owned but regularly used vehicle cannot make a claim against his own insurance policy if it contains a Regular Use Exclusion. So, the policy holder has lost the ability to protect himself or herself.

This leaves the injured driver of a non-owned but regularly used vehicle reliant on the insurance choices of the owner of the vehicle. However, that owner could choose to waive Underinsurance benefits altogether or purchase limits as low as $15,000. This is a troublesome situation in that the vehicle must be used regularly for work, but might be grossly underinsured.

Given this landmark decision, I strongly recommend the following for anyone who must regularly drive a vehicle that they do not own.

First, try to find car insurance without a Regular Use Exclusion and make sure that you purchase high amounts of Underinsurance Coverage ($250,000 or more like Mr. Rush). Second, talk to your employer and find out how much Underinsurance coverage there is on the vehicle that you regularly drive. If the limits waived or are low, you should lobby your employer to significantly increase the limits to protect you and your family in the event of a serious accident.

Tim Rayne is a Pennsylvania Car Accident Lawyer with MacElree Harvey, Ltd. For over 25 years, Tim has been helping Pennsylvania Car Accident Victims understand their legal rights and receive fair compensation from insurance companies. Tim has law offices in Kennett Square and West Chester Pennsylvania and also meets with clients at their homes or virtually. Tim can be reached at 610-840-0124 or [email protected] or you can check out his website at www.TimRayneLaw.com.

Filed Under: Articles by Our Attorneys, News

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 18
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

  • Articles by Our Attorneys
  • News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Newsletters

Footer

(610) 436-0100

LEGAL SERVICES

  • Banking & Finance Law
  • Business & Corporate Law
  • Criminal Defense
  • Employment Law
  • Estates & Trusts Law
  • Family Law
  • Litigation Law
  • Personal Injury Law
  • Real Estate & Land Use Law
  • Tax Law

ABOUT US

  • Our History
  • Our Approach
  • Social Responsibility
  • Testimonials

NEWS & INSIGHTS

  • Articles by Our Attorneys
  • News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Newsletters

OFFICES

Centreville, DE

5721 Kennett Pike
Wilmington, DE 19807
302-654-4454
Learn More

Hockessin, DE

724 Yorklyn Rd #100
Hockessin, DE 19707
302-239-3700
Learn More

Kennett Square, PA

209 East State Street Road
Kennett Square, PA 19348
610-444-3180
Learn More

West Chester, PA

17 West Miner Street
West Chester, PA 19382
610-436-0100
Learn More

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Staff Only
  • Careers

© 2025 and all rights reserved by MacElree Harvey, Ltd.