• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
MacElree Harvey, Ltd.

MacElree Harvey, Ltd.

Initiative in Practice

  • Home
  • Legal Services
        • Banking & Finance Law
        • Business & Corporate Law
        • Criminal Defense
        • Employment Law
        • Estates & Trusts Law
        • Family Law
        • Litigation Law
        • Mediation and Arbitration
        • Personal Injury Law
        • Real Estate & Land Use Law
        • Tax Law
  • Our Team
        • Joseph A. Bellinghieri
        • Patrick J. Boyer
        • Jeffrey P. Burke
        • Robert A. Burke
        • Matthew C. Cooper
        • John C. Cronin
        • Daniel T. Crossland
        • Marie I. Crossley
        • Harry J. DiDonato
        • Jaycie DiNardo
        • Caroline G. Donato
        • Sally A. Farrell
        • Brian J. Forgue
        • William J. Gallagher
        • Patrick J. Gallo, Jr.
        • Mary Kay Gaver
        • J. Charles Gerbron, Jr.
        • Leo M. Gibbons
        • Joseph P. Green, Jr.
        • Carolina Heinle
        • Court Heinle
        • Frank W. Hosking III
        • Katherine A. Isard
        • J. Kurtis Kline
        • Peter E. Kratsa
        • Mary E. Lawrence
        • Daniel R. Losco
        • Michael G. Louis
        • Jamison C. MacMain
        • John F. McKenna
        • Matthew M. McKeon
        • Brian L. Nagle
        • Lance J. Nelson
        • Timothy F. Rayne
        • Michael C. Rovito
        • Duke Schneider
        • Andrew R. Silverman
        • Ashley B. Stitzer
        • Robert M. Tucker
        • Natalie R. Young
  • About Us
    • Our History
    • Our Approach
    • Social Responsibility
    • Testimonials
  • Careers
  • News & Updates
    • Articles by Our Attorneys
    • News
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Newsletters
  • Offices
    • Centreville, DE
    • Hockessin, DE
    • Kennett Square, PA
    • West Chester, PA
  • Contact
  • (610) 436-0100

Articles by Our Attorneys

How COVID-19 Affects Your Taxes in 2020

August 27, 2020 by Joseph A. Bellinghieri, Esq.

By: Joseph A. Bellinghieri, Esq.

As many of us adjust to the reality of working from home, a new complication has set in: what to do about state taxes. Many people have a situation where they live in one state and commute to a job in another–for instance, you live in Pennsylvania, and drive to work in Delaware. You typically pay income taxes in both states. Now that many people are working from home, the question has arisen: Do you still still have to pay taxes in another state if you are not physically performing work in that state?

When we consider the taxes on our wages, we typically contemplate items such as federal income taxes paid through withholdings and other payroll taxes used to fund the Social Security and Medicare programs. As we all learned when we received our first paycheck, these amounts are significant. We often minimize the relevance of state income taxes because they are normally smaller than the amounts due to the federal government.

Typically, an individual will pay taxes on all their income to the state in which they reside. Residency is often defined as the location of an individual’s primary home or a location in which they have a second home and spend the majority of their time during the year. Even though a person may not reside in a particular state, they may be liable to pay taxes to that state if they earn income there as a non-resident. The most common of these items are wages earned for work performed in a particular state by a nonresident who commutes to their job location from their state of residency. ln that situation, the wages are taxed not only by the person’s home state but also by the state in which they performed their work. However, most states, including Pennsylvania, mitigate this double taxation by providing a tax credit to their residents for income taxes paid to other states. However, for individuals who normally work in high-tax states but reside in ones with lower income taxes, many times this credit doesn’t entirely address the effect of the double taxation and they will ultimately pay more state income tax than their peers who live and work in their state of residence.

Since so many employees are now working from home and away from their actualjob site, a question arises as to the location where an individual performs their job and earns their wages and which state is able to tax those wages. The primary
question that arises in that situation is whether their wages are still being earned in the state in which their job is located such that it is able to tax them, or are those wages being earned in their home state because that is the location in which the work is performed. The complexity of this question is exacerbated by the fact that most state tax codes are different and may have varying answers to this question. For instance in Delaware, you can file additional forms which show the dates you worked outside the state, and you should be able to receive a credit for those days against Delaware taxes.

As the U.S. Congress continues to fashion responses to the COVID pandemic, they have also begun to consider this issue. Senate Republicans have recently put forth a proposal for supplemental legislation to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (Cares Act), known for now as the Health, Economic Assistance, Liability Protection, and Schools Act (Heals Act). One of the proposed provisions in the Heals Act addresses this little-contemplated question of state tax law in hopes of providing a uniform rule and simplifying state tax filings for affected workers. lf passed, the Heals Act would modify state income tax rules by mandating that through 2024, employees who perform employment duties in multiple states would be subject to income tax only in their state of residence or any states in which they are present and performing employment duties for more than a limited time during the calendar year. Alternatively, the proposal would also allow employers to treat employee wages as earned in the state where an employee’s office is located and not in the state in which they are working from home. As noted in the proposed legislation, these provisions are intended to alleviate the confusion and create uniform procedures for assessing state income taxes on remote and mobile workers affected by government shutdown orders due to the COVID pandemic and changing work conditions during the economic recovery.

Filed Under: Articles by Our Attorneys

Complete Business Solutions Group, Inc., d/b/a Par Funding

August 18, 2020 by Michael G. Louis, Esq.

If you have a loan with Complete Business Solutions Group, Inc., d/b/a Par Funding (“Par Funding”), you should hire an attorney ASAP because they have just been placed into a receivership and you should know your rights. In the past, if you default on the loan, Par Funding will often file a confession of judgment against you in Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, and I have defended many of these. In addition to many of Par Funding’s loans charging exorbitant interest rates, they often confess judgment against not only the entity borrowing the money but the individual guarantor even though we have argued that the loan documents my clients have been given by Par Funding do not authorize a confession against the guarantor. If you are having trouble paying back the high interest rates on the hard money loan, a receiver has just been appointed for Par Funding and it will probably be easier to negotiate a settlement with the receiver than it would have been with Par Funding. An article in the Sunday Philadelphia Inquirer on July 31, 2020 stated some of the loans charged more than 400% interest and a sample of the loans found more than half carried interest rates of more than 95%. Protect your rights and hire an attorney.

It has recently come to light that, in addition to having problems with their borrowers, Par Funding is now being investigated by the Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment scam. The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filed a complaint in the Southern District of Florida against Complete Business Solutions Group, d/b/a Par Funding and other entities including Lisa McElhone and Joe Barletta a/k/a Joe Cole a/k/a Joe LaForte, Perry Abbonizio and Dean Vagnozzi, who advertises aggressively as “A Better Financial Plan”.

If you are an investor in Par Funding, you also need to hire an attorney ASAP as the SEC is asking a Federal Judge to freeze the assets of LaForte and McElhone, Vagnozzi and Abbonizio, and a receiver has been appointed for Par Funding to protect any remaining investor assets.

Michael G. Louis, Esquire
MacElree Harvey, Ltd.
17 West Miner Street
P.O. Box 660
West Chester, PA 19381-0660
(610) 840-0228
e-mail: [email protected]

Filed Under: Articles by Our Attorneys

Specific Provisions of the New Bankruptcy Law Give Small Businesses Invaluable Tools to Successfully Reorganize

June 16, 2020 by Leo M. Gibbons, Esq.

In a recent article, we discussed the enactment of The Small Business Reorganization Act (“SBRA”), which went into effect on February 19, 2020. This article will discuss some of its more significant provisions, which give small businesses effective new tools for dealing with debt and creditors, and for successfully reorganizing under the amendments to Subchapter V of the Bankruptcy Code.

There are numerous significant changes under Subchapter V benefitting the debtor. There is no unsecured creditors committee. An individual case trustee is assigned to each case, whose role is supervisory and to facilitate the debtor getting a consensual plan with creditors. These changes, along with others referenced herein, evidence the intent of the amendments to encourage consensual plans and avoid the contentiousness that sometimes arises in regular Chapter 11 cases between the debtor and the creditors committee and/or the US Trustee.

There are also no US Trustee fees and no requirement to file a disclosure statement in Subchapter V cases. Unlike regular Chapter 11 cases, only Subchapter V debtors may file a plan and only Subchapter V debtors may modify that plan. Some deadlines are also accelerated in comparison to a regular Chapter 11 case; for example, the Subchapter V debtor must file its plan within 90 days of commencement of the case.

Also, of great significance is the fact that the Absolute Priority Rule does not apply, which was often a significant impediment to small business debtors confirming and completing a plan of reorganization. The Absolute Priority Rule prevents a debtor from retaining any property if it does not pay all of its creditors in full. Moreover, the debtor is not required to contribute new value in order to get a plan confirmed. The Subchapter V debtor also has the ability to “cramdown” or, in other words, reduce or discharge the debt owed to unsecured creditors. These provisions will not only enhance the odds of putting together a confirmable plan but will facilitate the debtor’s ability to successfully negotiate with creditors.

Because of the tighter deadlines in Subchapter V bankruptcy cases, and the new provisions for dealing with creditors, it is expected that Subchapter V cases can proceed more quickly, can be completed for less cost and will result in consensual plans between a debtor and its creditors.
These attributes are of great value to small businesses seeking to reorganize and will place a premium on pre-bankruptcy planning and negotiations with creditors.

Filed Under: Articles by Our Attorneys

COVID Relief – Mortgage and Rental Assistance Grant Program

June 11, 2020 by Michael G. Louis, Esq.

On May 29, 2020, the Pennsylvania Legislature passed the COVID Relief – Mortgage and Rental Assistance Grant Program. A minimum of $150,000,000.00 was allocated for rental assistance grants and the money has been appropriated to the Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency for COVID Relief. The Agency must establish guidelines that are consistent with the provisions of the Act within thirty (30) days of May 29, 2020. An eligible lessee (tenant), mortgagor (homeowner), landlord or mortgagee (bank) may apply for relief if the tenant or homeowner became unemployed after March 1, 2020 or had their annual household income reduced by 30% or more due to reduced work hours and wages related to COVID-19.

The Agency is to develop an application for eligible tenants, homeowners, landlords or lenders to apply for assistance under the Act within thirty (30) days of May 29, 2020.

The application shall include a statement by the landlord or lender releasing the tenant or homeowner of any remaining obligation for any past due or future rent or mortgage payment for which the Agency pays the landlord or lender.

Only households with an annualized current income of no more than the upper limit of “median income” will qualify.

For rental assistance, an amount equal to 100% of the tenant’s monthly rent, not to exceed $750.00 per month, for each month for which assistance is sought for a maximum of six months is available. For mortgage assistance, an amount equal to 100% of the homeowner’s monthly mortgage, not to exceed $1,000.00 per month for each month for which assistance is sought for a maximum of six months is available. Payment shall be made no later than November 30, 2020.

Filed Under: Articles by Our Attorneys

New Bankruptcy Law is a Game Changer for Small Businesses Facing Financial Hardship

June 9, 2020 by Leo M. Gibbons, Esq.

The Small Business Reorganization Act (“SBRA”) codified amendments to the Bankruptcy Code and went into effect on February 19, 2020.  Prior to these amendments, small businesses attempting to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code regularly faced tremendous hurdles in confirming a plan of reorganization and, if successfully confirming a plan, seeing that plan to completion.  These obstacles included the large expenses associated with Chapter 11 cases, the legal requirements imposed upon the reorganizing debtor under the bankruptcy laws and an often adversarial relationship between the reorganizing debtor and the unsecured creditors committee and/or the United States Trustee.

The amendments governing small business debtors are found in Subchapter V of the Code and serve to reduce the obstacles faced by small businesses attempting to reorganize.  These amendments are designed to reduce the time and cost of reorganization for small businesses, ease the burden of compliance, create a relationship with the case trustee that is more conducive to obtaining a consensual plan of reorganization, and provide the reorganizing debtor with new tools to deal with unsecured creditors. All of these changes should allow small business debtors to confirm more workable plans and successfully complete a reorganization.

Originally, the cap for filing as a small business debtor under Subchapter V was $2,725,625, at least 50% of which must have arisen from commercial or business activity.  Significantly, insider debt (essentially debt owed to the owner) is not counted towards the cap.  Under the recently passed CARES Act, the cap was raised to $7.5 million for cases filed on or before March 27, 2021, which will allow many more debt burdened small businesses to take advantage of the benefits of Subchapter V.

In the next few weeks, we will publish a companion article highlighting some of the more significant changes in Subchapter V.  These changes will illustrate how this new subchapter gives qualifying small businesses new tools for managing debt and creditors, and reorganizing under the bankruptcy laws.

Filed Under: Articles by Our Attorneys

New Guidelines on Payroll Protection Plan (PPP) Loan Forgiveness

June 8, 2020 by Mary Kay Gaver, Esq.

On June 5, 2020, the President signed into law important revisions to the Payroll Protection Program, including significant changes to the requirements for PPP Loan forgiveness.

The changes are consistent with the bill passed by the House on May 28th which are outlined in the Southern Chester County Chamber of Commerce Webinar. The webinar also includes an overview of the PPP loan forgiveness application process.

The highlights of the recently enacted changes to the PPP program include:

  1. Small Businesses now have 24 weeks (instead of 8) to spend their PPP funds;
  2. Borrowers have to spend at least 60% of the PPP Funds on payroll costs and can spend up to 40% on other approved expenses. The prior ratio was 75/25. It is important to note that if a business does not spend at least 60%  of their PPP funds on payroll expenses, ALL of the PPP funds become a loan;
  3. Employers have until 12/31 (instead of 6/30) to bring employees back to full time status;
  4. PPP recipients will also be able to take advantage of payroll tax deferrals; and
  5. Any PPP funds that are not eligible for forgiveness will become a loan that can be repaid over 5 years (instead of 2).

 How the PPP program’s requirements apply to your business and its forgiveness application requires a very fact specific analysis. If you have questions about how to best your PPP funds or apply for loan forgiveness, please contact Mary Kay Gaver at [email protected].

Filed Under: Articles by Our Attorneys

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 22
  • Page 23
  • Page 24
  • Page 25
  • Page 26
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 30
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

  • Articles by Our Attorneys
  • News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Newsletters

Footer

(610) 436-0100

LEGAL SERVICES

  • Banking & Finance Law
  • Business & Corporate Law
  • Criminal Defense
  • Employment Law
  • Estates & Trusts Law
  • Family Law
  • Litigation Law
  • Personal Injury Law
  • Real Estate & Land Use Law
  • Tax Law

ABOUT US

  • Our History
  • Our Approach
  • Social Responsibility
  • Testimonials

NEWS & INSIGHTS

  • Articles by Our Attorneys
  • News
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Newsletters

OFFICES

Centreville, DE

5721 Kennett Pike
Wilmington, DE 19807
302-654-4454
Learn More

Hockessin, DE

724 Yorklyn Rd #100
Hockessin, DE 19707
302-239-3700
Learn More

Kennett Square, PA

209 East State Street Road
Kennett Square, PA 19348
610-444-3180
Learn More

West Chester, PA

17 West Miner Street
West Chester, PA 19382
610-436-0100
Learn More

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Staff Only
  • Careers

© 2025 and all rights reserved by MacElree Harvey, Ltd.